This Day in History: March 2

“Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the enemy. They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor necessary.”

US General David Petraeus

h2

Here are some ‘Intelligence-related’ events that occurred on a March 2. Follow us on Twitter: @Intel_Today

March 2 2008 — The New York Time Editorial ‘Horrifying and Unnecessary’ reads:

We urge him [US President G. W. Bush] to read the Army Field Manual, which says: “Use of torture by U.S. personnel would bring discredit upon the U.S. and its armed forces while undermining domestic and international support for the war effort. It could also place U.S. and allied personnel in enemy hands at greater risk of abuse.”

He could listen to 43 retired generals or a bipartisan coalition of 18 former members of Congress, secretaries of state and national security officials who all supported the anti-torture amendment.

He could check the testimony of Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, who told Congress last week that waterboarding violated the Geneva Conventions.

Or he could read the letter that Gen. David Petraeus, the commander in Iraq, wrote to his troops.

“Some may argue that we would be more effective if we sanctioned torture or other expedient methods to obtain information from the enemy,” General Petraeus wrote.

“They would be wrong. Beyond the basic fact that such actions are illegal, history shows that they also are frequently neither useful nor necessary.”

On March 3 2008, The CIA replied.

The following letter to the editor, published in the March 9 edition of The New York Times, responds to a March 2 editorial:

To the Editor:

“Horrifying and Unnecessary” (editorial, March 2) cites interrogation measures that are specifically banned by the Army Field Manual, including forcing prisoners to perform sexual acts, applying electric shocks and conducting mock executions.

The implication is that those measures would be used by the Central Intelligence Agency or other intelligence services if the intelligence authorization bill is vetoed by the president. They would not. The C.I.A. neither conducts nor condones torture.

As the C.I.A. director, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, has said, the Army Field Manual meets the needs of the American military services and is sufficient for their purposes.

But it does not exhaust the universe of lawful interrogation measures available to the Republic to defend itself against hardened terrorists — techniques not useful or suited to the Army’s circumstances but fully consistent with the Geneva Conventions and with current United States law.

These are the interrogation measures in the C.I.A.’s current interrogation program — not the ones cited in your editorial. They have been fully briefed to the intelligence oversight committees, and their lawfulness has been confirmed by the Justice Department.

Mark Mansfield
Director of Public Affairs
Central Intelligence Agency McLean, Va.
March 3, 2008

Jimmy Carter on Abu Ghraib

REFERENCES

Horrifying and Unnecessary” — NYT March 2 2008

CIA Response to March 2 NY Times Editorial — March 11, 2008

This entry was posted in This Day in History and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s