“The impression I have … is that [Assange] is a man who wants to impose his terms on the course of justice, whether the course of justice is in this jurisdiction or in Sweden. He appears to consider himself above the normal rules of law and wants justice only if it goes in his favor. (…) Defendants on bail up and down the country, and requested persons facing extradition, come to the court to face the consequences of their choices.”
Senior District Judge Emma Arbuthnot
“Whether it [an appeal against the decision] is pursued is another question. The history of the case from start to finish is extraordinary. Each aspect of it becomes puzzling and troubling as it is scrutinised.”
Gareth Peirce — Member of Assange’s legal team
UPDATE (Feb 17 2018)– The media failed to report a basic fact. The husband of judge Arbuthnot is a partner of Sir John Scarlett, the former Head of MI6. Blind justice?
February 13 2018 — LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lost his bid to overturn an arrest warrant that has prompted him to take refuge in London’s Ecuadorian Embassy for nearly six years. Follow us on Twitter: @Intel_Today
RELATED POST: WikiLeaks — Arrest Warrant Against Assange Still Valid
RELATED POST: SWEDEN — Julian Assange Case Dropped. Kind of…
RELATED POST: CIA Statement on Claims by Wikileaks
UPDATE (February 17 2018) — Craig Murray was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010. He just posted an interesting piece about the Assange ruling.
“Security Intelligence Consultancy” SC Strategy Ltd has only three directors. One is the husband of the judge in yesterday’s Assange ruling.
One is the former Head of MI6, Sir John Scarlett, who is synonymous with crooked security operations and personally wrote the notorious dossier of lies on Iraqi WMD, thus causing the subsequent deaths of millions of people.
One is Lord Carlile, who was notably close to protected Establishment paedophiles Greville Janner and Cyril Smith. Is the British Establishment not endlessly fascinating?
The corporate media has published no information about “Lady” Arbuthnot’s background and sinister links at all, despite the fact it is uniformly carrying her jibes at Assange as a major story.
There can be no clearer example of the fact that it is the corporate media which, deliberately and systematically, spreads fake news, while bloggers get out the actual facts via social media.
END of UPDATE
Judge Arbuthnot ruled the warrant must stand, leaving Assange’s legal position unchanged.
The Court also rejected findings by the United Nations that Mr Assange had been forced into imprisonment.
“An arrest warrant for the Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been upheld by Westminster Magistrates’ Court.
The warrant was issued when Mr Assange, 46, breached bail conditions in 2012 by seeking political refuge at the Ecuadorean embassy.
He was facing sexual assault allegations in Sweden. The allegations were dropped in May 2017.” [BBC]
On Friday February 5 2016, a UN panel published its findings which concluded that Julian Assange was “arbitrarily detained” by the UK and Sweden for more than five years.
The UN panel found that Julian Assange should be released immediately with compensation.
In November 2016, a United Nations panel maintained that Assange continue to be “arbitrarily detained” in London notwithstanding an appeal brought by the British government.
UK court upholds Assange arrest warrant
WikiLeaks — UK court upholds Assange arrest warrant
WikiLeaks — UK Court Upholds Assange Arrest Warrant [UPDATE]